Petitions to the Chamber of Deputies

OBJECT : We call for the creation of a legal framework allowing responsible bivouacking in Luxembourg under strict conditions respecting nature and following the "Leave No Trace" principle. Bivouacking differs from traditional wild camping: it is a light, temporary and discreet overnight stay in nature, generally limited to one night, between sunset and sunrise, without permanent installations or long-term occupation of the area. This practice is mainly used by hikers, cyclists, trekkers and outdoor travelers wishing to spend a night in nature while respecting the environment. The aim of this petition is not to authorize permanent or uncontrolled wild camping, but to allow a reasonable, discreet and responsible use of natural areas. We specifically propose: * authorization limited to one night in the same location; * a strict obligation to leave no waste behind; * prohibition of open fires; * full respect for private property, wildlife and flora; * prohibition in sensitive natural or protected areas; * use of lightweight and discreet equipment only. Several European countries already apply similar regulations successfully, balancing environmental protection with responsible access to nature. This measure would help: * promote sustainable tourism; * encourage outdoor and nature-based activities; * strengthen environmental awareness; * support a responsible and regulated outdoor culture in Luxembourg.

OBJECT : ​L'objectif est d'augmenter le plafond légal des unités de distance déductibles fiscalement (actuellement limité à 30 unités) afin de ne plus pénaliser les travailleurs résidant dans les régions périphériques, notamment le Nord du pays.

OBJECT : Nous nous opposons à l'introduction au Luxembourg d'une disposition prévoyant des sanctions pénales pour l'utilisation des données issues des décisions de justice à des fins d'analyse, de comparaison ou d'évaluation des pratiques des magistrats. La formulation proposée dans le projet de loi n°8721 instaure une interdiction large du « profilage » des magistrats, y compris via des outils automatisés. Elle risque d'englober non seulement des abus, mais aussi des activités légitimes et d'intérêt public.