Petitions to the Chamber of Deputies

OBJECT : Safety is a fundamental right, yet a growing sense of insecurity is gripping our streets. Current police presence is clearly insufficient to protect citizens from rising street crime and public disturbances. We respectfully ask the Chamber of Deputies take immediate action to: 1. Substantially increase visible police foot patrols across urban areas around the clock. 2. Drastically strengthen night shifts to secure our streets when risk is highest. 3. Deploy the immediate human and material resources necessary to restore public safety While police forces do an admirable job with available resources, current patrol levels-especially during late-night and overnight hours-are insufficient to effectively deter petty crime, public disturbances, and anti-social behavior.

OBJECT : La présente pétition demande l'introduction, dans le Code de la route luxembourgeois, d'un cadre légal clair autorisant les conducteurs de deux-roues motorisés à circuler entre les files de véhicules lorsque la circulation est fortement ralentie ou complètement arrêtée. Cette pratique devrait être soumise à des conditions strictes afin de garantir la sécurité de tous les usagers de la route, notamment : * circuler uniquement entre les deux files situées le plus à gauche ; * respecter une vitesse maximale de 30 km/h lorsque les véhicules sont à l'arrêt ou fortement ralentis ; * ne pas dépasser de plus de 20 km/h la vitesse des autres véhicules ; * reprendre sa place dans une voie dès que la circulation redevient fluide ; * interdire l'utilisation de la bande d'arrêt d'urgence, des pistes cyclables et des voies réservées ; * effectuer la manoeuvre avec prudence et en maintenant une distance de sécurité suffisante.

OBJECT : Introduce legislation requiring employers in Luxembourg to provide specific, written and factual reasons for rejecting job applicants. The legislation should establish the following obligations: Specific feedback: Identify the professional skills, qualifications, experience or assessment results decisive in the rejection. Generic explanations must not be considered sufficient. Clear justification: Distinguish between candidates who fail to meet essential requirements and qualified candidates rejected in favour of another applicant, specifying the decisive selection criteria. Documented selection criteria: Establish selection criteria before evaluating candidates and document recruitment decisions. Record retention: Retain recruitment assessments and decisions for a legally defined period, in compliance with data protection legislation. Independent review: Allow candidates to request an independent examination where reasonable grounds exist to suspect discrimination, favouritism or other irregularities. Enforcement: Establish reasonable deadlines for providing feedback, effective oversight mechanisms and proportionate sanctions for non-compliance. The required level of detail should reflect the stage reached in the recruitment process.